Home › League stats › Copa Gaúcha › Bagé

Copa Gaúcha · Brazil

Bagé form, results and statistics

Based on 8 matches in our results archive, last updated 22 Oct 2026.

Bagé at a glance

8matches
3–2–3won–drawn–lost
0.88goals scored / game
0.88goals conceded / game
50%both teams scored
25%over 2.5 goals
25%clean sheets

Last 8 (newest first): WLWLDLWD

Form and goals analysis

Bagé have played 8 matches in our results archive between 14 May 2026 and 5 Jul 2026, most of them in the Copa Gaúcha (Brazil). They won 3, drew 2 and lost 3, scoring 7 goals and conceding 7 — 0.88 scored and 0.88 conceded per game.

At home they won 0 of 4 (0%) and averaged 0.75 goals a game; on the road it was 3 wins from 4 (75%) with 1.00 goals a game. Unusually, they have been at least as effective away from home as in front of their own crowd.

Both teams scored in 4 of their 8 matches (50%), and 2 (25%) finished with three or more goals. They kept 2 clean sheets (25%) and failed to score in 2 (25%). Their games are usually tight and low-scoring.

Over their most recent 8 matches the record is 3 won, 2 drawn and 3 lost, with 7 goals for and 7 against (1.38 points per game). That is in line with their longer-run average of 1.38 points per game.

Home and away

PWDLGFGAWin %
Home4022350%
Away43014275%
All83237738%

Latest results

DateCompetitionMatch
5 Jul 2026Copa GaúchaGramadense 0–1 BagéW
27 Jun 2026Copa GaúchaBagé 0–1 GramadenseL
17 Jun 2026Copa GaúchaFarroupilha 1–2 BagéW
14 Jun 2026Copa GaúchaBagé 1–2 Guarany de BagéL
4 Jun 2026Copa GaúchaBagé 1–1 Brasil DE PelotasD
28 May 2026Copa GaúchaBrasil DE Pelotas 1–0 BagéL
21 May 2026Copa GaúchaGuarany de Bagé 0–1 BagéW
14 May 2026Copa GaúchaBagé 1–1 FarroupilhaD

How these numbers are calculated

Every figure on this page comes from final scores (90 minutes, extra time excluded) stored in the PunterPick results archive, which covers every competition our data provider reports. Percentages are simple counts over the matches listed; nothing is estimated or filled in. The attack and defence ratings come from our own team-strength model, explained on the methodology page.