Home › League stats › Capixaba B › Tupy

Capixaba B · Brazil

Tupy form, results and statistics

Based on 8 matches in our results archive, last updated 22 Oct 2026.

Tupy at a glance

8matches
3–1–4won–drawn–lost
1.00goals scored / game
1.75goals conceded / game
38%both teams scored
38%over 2.5 goals
25%clean sheets

Last 8 (newest first): LWDWLLLW

Form and goals analysis

Tupy have played 8 matches in our results archive between 11 Jul 2026 and 22 Aug 2026, most of them in the Capixaba B (Brazil). They won 3, drew 1 and lost 4, scoring 8 goals and conceding 14 — 1.00 scored and 1.75 conceded per game.

At home they won 2 of 4 (50%) and averaged 0.50 goals a game; on the road it was 1 wins from 4 (25%) with 1.50 goals a game. That is a clear home-and-away split, and worth remembering before reading too much into an away fixture.

Both teams scored in 3 of their 8 matches (38%), and 3 (38%) finished with three or more goals. They kept 2 clean sheets (25%) and failed to score in 3 (38%). Their goal totals sit close to the middle of the range we see across all competitions.

Over their most recent 8 matches the record is 3 won, 1 drawn and 4 lost, with 8 goals for and 14 against (1.25 points per game). That is in line with their longer-run average of 1.25 points per game.

Home and away

PWDLGFGAWin %
Home42022350%
Away411261125%
All831481438%

Latest results

DateCompetitionMatch
22 Aug 2026Capixaba BEstrela do Norte 4–0 TupyL
19 Aug 2026Capixaba BTupy 1–0 Sport Brasil ESW
15 Aug 2026Capixaba BRive 1–1 TupyD
8 Aug 2026Capixaba BPinheiros 1–4 TupyW
25 Jul 2026Capixaba BTupy 0–1 Estrela do NorteL
21 Jul 2026Capixaba BSport Brasil ES 5–1 TupyL
18 Jul 2026Capixaba BTupy 0–2 RiveL
11 Jul 2026Capixaba BTupy 1–0 PinheirosW

How these numbers are calculated

Every figure on this page comes from final scores (90 minutes, extra time excluded) stored in the PunterPick results archive, which covers every competition our data provider reports. Percentages are simple counts over the matches listed; nothing is estimated or filled in. The attack and defence ratings come from our own team-strength model, explained on the methodology page.