Home › League stats › 3. liga - CFL B › Pardubice II
3. liga - CFL B · Czech-Republic
Pardubice II form, results and statistics
Based on 24 matches in our results archive, last updated 22 Oct 2026.
Pardubice II at a glance
Last 10 (newest first): WLWLWDDWWL
Form and goals analysis
Pardubice II have played 24 matches in our results archive between 12 Apr 2026 and 18 Oct 2026, most of them in the 3. liga - CFL B (Czech-Republic). They won 13, drew 3 and lost 8, scoring 58 goals and conceding 36 — 2.42 scored and 1.50 conceded per game.
At home they won 7 of 10 (70%) and averaged 3.40 goals a game; on the road it was 6 wins from 14 (43%) with 1.71 goals a game. That is a clear home-and-away split, and worth remembering before reading too much into an away fixture.
Both teams scored in 12 of their 24 matches (50%), and 19 (79%) finished with three or more goals. They kept 10 clean sheets (42%) and failed to score in 3 (13%). Their games tend to be open, with goals at both ends.
Over their most recent 10 matches the record is 5 won, 2 drawn and 3 lost, with 22 goals for and 11 against (1.70 points per game). That is in line with their longer-run average of 1.75 points per game.
Our team-strength model rates Pardubice II's attack at 1.56 and their defence at 0.81, where 1.00 is an average side in their competition and a lower defence number is better. The attack is well above average. The defence concedes clearly less than an average side. Against an average opponent the model expects them to score about 2.70 and concede about 1.20 goals in a home match. The ratings are refitted every night from the last 180 days of results, with recent matches weighted more heavily.
Home and away
| P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Win % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 34 | 13 | 70% |
| Away | 14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 24 | 23 | 43% |
| All | 24 | 13 | 3 | 8 | 58 | 36 | 54% |
Previous PunterPick predictions for Pardubice II
Each prediction is shown exactly as it was published before kick-off, with the final score once the match was played.
- Pardubice II vs Velké Hamry · 18 Oct 2026, 08:15 UTC · 3. liga - CFL B
Published pick: BTTS Yes @ 1.57 - Neratovice-Byškovice vs Pardubice II · 10 Oct 2026, 08:15 UTC · 3. liga - CFL B
Published pick: BTTS Yes @ 1.47 · FT 3–0
Latest results
| Date | Competition | Match | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18 Oct 2026 | 3. liga - CFL B | Pardubice II 6–0 Velké Hamry | W |
| 10 Oct 2026 | 3. liga - CFL B | Neratovice-Byškovice 3–0 Pardubice II | L |
| 26 Sep 2026 | 3. liga - CFL B | Chrudim 0–1 Pardubice II | W |
| 20 Sep 2026 | 3. liga - CFL B | Pardubice II 2–3 Benátky nad Jizerou | L |
| 16 Sep 2026 | 3. liga - CFL B | Sokol Brozany 0–1 Pardubice II | W |
| 11 Sep 2026 | 3. liga - CFL B | Slovan Liberec II 2–2 Pardubice II | D |
| 6 Sep 2026 | 3. liga - CFL B | Teplice II 1–1 Pardubice II | D |
| 30 Aug 2026 | 3. liga - CFL B | Pardubice II 7–0 Čáslav | W |
| 16 Aug 2026 | 3. liga - CFL B | Pardubice II 1–0 Baník Souš | W |
| 9 Aug 2026 | 3. liga - CFL B | Hradec Králové II 2–1 Pardubice II | L |
| 25 Jul 2026 | Friendlies Clubs | Zagłębie Lubin II 0–5 Pardubice II | W |
| 22 Jul 2026 | Friendlies Clubs | Vysoké Mýto 2–3 Pardubice II | W |
| 18 Jul 2026 | Friendlies Clubs | Viktoria Plzeň II 1–2 Pardubice II | W |
| 11 Jul 2026 | Friendlies Clubs | Pardubice II 3–4 Bohemians 1905 II | L |
| 6 Jun 2026 | 3. liga - CFL B | Pardubice II 3–2 Jablonec II | W |
| 31 May 2026 | 3. liga - CFL B | Slovan Liberec II 5–2 Pardubice II | L |
| 27 May 2026 | 3. liga - CFL B | Hradec Králové II 3–2 Pardubice II | L |
| 24 May 2026 | 3. liga - CFL B | Pardubice II 4–1 Velké Hamry | W |
| 17 May 2026 | 3. liga - CFL B | Benátky nad Jizerou 0–0 Pardubice II | D |
| 6 May 2026 | 3. liga - CFL B | Pardubice II 2–3 Arsenal Česká Lípa | L |
How these numbers are calculated
Every figure on this page comes from final scores (90 minutes, extra time excluded) stored in the PunterPick results archive, which covers every competition our data provider reports. Percentages are simple counts over the matches listed; nothing is estimated or filled in. The attack and defence ratings come from our own team-strength model, explained on the methodology page.