Home › League stats › Friendlies › Latvia U17
Friendlies · World
Latvia U17 form, results and statistics
Based on 5 matches in our results archive, last updated 22 Oct 2026.
Latvia U17 at a glance
Last 5 (newest first): LWWWD
Form and goals analysis
Latvia U17 have played 5 matches in our results archive between 3 Jun 2026 and 2 Jul 2026, most of them in the Friendlies (World). They won 3, drew 1 and lost 1, scoring 14 goals and conceding 10 — 2.80 scored and 2.00 conceded per game.
At home they won 2 of 3 (67%) and averaged 3.33 goals a game; on the road it was 1 wins from 2 (50%) with 2.00 goals a game. Their results hold up broadly the same at home and away.
Both teams scored in 4 of their 5 matches (80%), and 5 (100%) finished with three or more goals. They kept 1 clean sheets (20%) and failed to score in 0 (0%). Their games tend to be open, with goals at both ends.
Over their most recent 5 matches the record is 3 won, 1 drawn and 1 lost, with 14 goals for and 10 against (2.00 points per game). That is in line with their longer-run average of 2.00 points per game.
Home and away
| P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Win % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 67% |
| Away | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 50% |
| All | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 10 | 60% |
Latest results
| Date | Competition | Match | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Jul 2026 | Friendlies | Finland U17 5–1 Latvia U17 | L |
| 30 Jun 2026 | Friendlies | Latvia U17 3–0 Estonia U17 | W |
| 28 Jun 2026 | Friendlies | Latvia U17 5–1 Lithuania U17 | W |
| 6 Jun 2026 | UEFA U17 Championship - Qualification | Ukraine U17 2–3 Latvia U17 | W |
| 3 Jun 2026 | UEFA U17 Championship - Qualification | Latvia U17 2–2 Albania U17 | D |
How these numbers are calculated
Every figure on this page comes from final scores (90 minutes, extra time excluded) stored in the PunterPick results archive, which covers every competition our data provider reports. Percentages are simple counts over the matches listed; nothing is estimated or filled in. The attack and defence ratings come from our own team-strength model, explained on the methodology page.