Home › League stats › Liga III - Serie 5 › CSL Nanov

Liga III - Serie 5 · Romania

CSL Nanov form, results and statistics

Based on 5 matches in our results archive, last updated 22 Oct 2026.

CSL Nanov at a glance

5matches
1–1–3won–drawn–lost
1.00goals scored / game
2.80goals conceded / game
60%both teams scored
80%over 2.5 goals
0%clean sheets

Last 5 (newest first): DLWLL

Form and goals analysis

CSL Nanov have played 5 matches in our results archive between 10 Apr 2026 and 15 May 2026, most of them in the Liga III - Serie 5 (Romania). They won 1, drew 1 and lost 3, scoring 5 goals and conceding 14 — 1.00 scored and 2.80 conceded per game.

At home they won 1 of 3 (33%) and averaged 1.33 goals a game; on the road it was 0 wins from 2 (0%) with 0.50 goals a game. That is a clear home-and-away split, and worth remembering before reading too much into an away fixture.

Both teams scored in 3 of their 5 matches (60%), and 4 (80%) finished with three or more goals. They kept 0 clean sheets (0%) and failed to score in 2 (40%). Their games tend to be open, with goals at both ends.

Over their most recent 5 matches the record is 1 won, 1 drawn and 3 lost, with 5 goals for and 14 against (0.80 points per game). That is in line with their longer-run average of 0.80 points per game.

Home and away

PWDLGFGAWin %
Home31114533%
Away2002190%
All511351420%

Latest results

DateCompetitionMatch
15 May 2026Liga III - Serie 5CSL Nanov 2–2 AlexandriaD
1 May 2026Liga III - Serie 5Filiaşi 3–1 CSL NanovL
25 Apr 2026Liga III - Serie 5CSL Nanov 2–1 Axi Adunații-CopăceniW
17 Apr 2026Liga III - Serie 5Dunărea 2020 Giurgiu 6–0 CSL NanovL
10 Apr 2026Liga III - Serie 5CSL Nanov 0–2 Progresul SpartacL

How these numbers are calculated

Every figure on this page comes from final scores (90 minutes, extra time excluded) stored in the PunterPick results archive, which covers every competition our data provider reports. Percentages are simple counts over the matches listed; nothing is estimated or filled in. The attack and defence ratings come from our own team-strength model, explained on the methodology page.